Dakota/Memphis

[Bigsmooth]

Memphis gets:

LT Derrick Danner

Dakota gets:
2nd (2011)
4th (2011)

Sully was the only GM to inquire about Danner and he wins himself a starting LT. I've got plenty of picks for this year and it's always nice to acquire future picks. Thanks Sully and good luck.

[Sully]

Memphis was hit hard with two retirements of stud offensive linemen. We're happy to have Danner on board.

[Delandis]

Memphis gets:

LT Derrick Danner

Dakota gets:
2nd (2011)
4th (2011)

Sully was the only GM to inquire about Danner and he wins himself a starting LT. I've got plenty of picks for this year and it's always nice to acquire future picks. Thanks Sully and good luck.

Well I just kinda figured he wasn't coming to Iowa....

[Guest]

Sully was the only GM to inquire about Danner and he wins himself a starting LT.

lol -- If I knew that was all you wanted....

[Bigsmooth]

lol -- If I knew that was all you wanted....

Ha. Admittedly, I do have a hard time valueing my players. That being said, DE Cassidy, who is rated similarly to Danner at his position was traded for only one 2nd rounder. Also, he was on the block for a long while and you could have easily made an offer.

[Guest]

Ha. Admittedly, I do have a hard time valueing my players. That being said, DE Cassidy, who is rated similarly to Danner at his position was traded for only one 2nd rounder. Also, he was on the block for a long while and you could have easily made an offer.

I did not like his stats but at 2.31 it was a good deal for both

[Bigsmooth]

I did not like his stats but at 2.31 it was a good deal for both

So trading DE Cassidy for 2.31 is a good value but Danner for a future 2nd and 4th (potentially higher than 31) isn't? I'm not looking to argue here, just hoping that others will chime in. It's tough to make these deals and would like to know if this trade is seen as lopsided?