2037 Draft

[Guest]

That didn't go how I thought! I thought at least one of the WRs would have gone by now. Good thing I interviewed them in the latest file.

I want to see the latest file tonight so my pick won't be before 6 pm EST and probably even a bit later than that.

The Cult of the WR is FOF2k7, not FOF7.

Since there are no obvious QB studs, it's pretty much wide open on who will go.

[sawblade300]

Draft went bye bye. Page gone.

[IrishGuy65]

Yeah, I thought I had a shot a Begian at 1.6...

[Guest]

Draft went bye bye. Page gone.

??

Pulls up for me.

[sawblade300]

??

Pulls up for me.

It's back. Must have been temporary.

[Nemesis]

Either way, I'll get what I want out of this draft too, just like last year with the 1.3.... oh wait.............................................. ..........................................

[Guest]

Pick made a bit sooner than I thought. Any thoughts?

[Cory]

You screwed up the mock draft. You were supposed to take Kafka.

[Guest]

Pick made a bit sooner than I thought. Any thoughts?

I probably would've taken Rayburn and his 4.33.

I didn't bother interviewing them but Burkley's 4.44 and his BPR bar are interesting. Definitely would've wanted to see where that landed because I'm scared it'll end up 60.

[Guest]

Either way, I'll get what I want out of this draft too, just like last year with the 1.3.... oh wait.............................................. ..........................................

Duuuuuuuuuude, there's tons or great choices left.

[Aston]

I might've gone with Rayburn as well. Burkley has a chance to be quite awesome, too, but I would just feel better given Rayburn has truly out of this world 40 dash and agility scores.

My scout's pretty good; he has Burkley's BPR as 60-87. I guess it could still be 60, though! Ha!

*IF* Burkley holds up and is a mega-stud, then he could be the better pick because he shows up much more ready to play. In the long run Rayburn feels like a safer bet, though.

[Guest]

I will talk about why I made my pick later. His BPR showed 60-72 to me after I interviewed him. It will probably be on the low end of that range but the higher the better.

[Guest]

So my take on the two WRs. I am not sure which one will be better but I wanted Rayburn's big play to be higher. When it showed around 70ish after the interview, it threw up red flags to me. Scout also showed him as overrated.

Burkley was a bit different. His big play, while lower than Rayburn's, comes out higher than I would expect based on the combine. Scout also put him as scouted. He showed very nice bars.

I dunno. In the end I think they will be very similar.

[IrishGuy65]

On a scale of 25-100, I had Rayburn at 98 and Burkley at 86.

[pizzaddict]

How does the mock draft get filled out on the draft utility? Is it an automated thing?