Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2031 Draft Class

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    I think that's going to preclude them from some decent players.
    Float likeabutterflysting likeabee.

    Comment


    • #32
      Can anyone post the combine of the best QB right now drafted two drafts ago?? (Chustz's class) I think that his name is Harvey or something similar?? From MTC??
      Miami Sharks (BLB)
      * BLB Champions --> 2017, 2020.

      Ohio River Sharks (OSFL)
      * OSFL Bowl CHAMPION > 2036, 2047.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Sharkn20 View Post
        Can anyone post the combine of the best QB right now drafted two drafts ago?? (Chustz's class) I think that his name is Harvey or something similar?? From MTC??
        You probably mean my lovely 3rd rounder, Brian Douglas.

        Comment


        • #34

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by FoosballWizard View Post
            You probably mean my lovely 3rd rounder, Brian Douglas.
            Put Douglas combine too
            Miami Sharks (BLB)
            * BLB Champions --> 2017, 2020.

            Ohio River Sharks (OSFL)
            * OSFL Bowl CHAMPION > 2036, 2047.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Sharkn20 View Post
              Put Douglas combine too
              Eh. Not worth the time to take a screenshot.

              28, 4.82, 12, 7.43, 107, 68

              His bars looks exactly like what his combine numbers are.

              Comment


              • #37
                Now Check Chustz (31/50), Harvey (56/60) and Douglas (33/45), and rated them by usefull QBs during the games, I think that Chustz is the most serviciable despite his Ratings, but Harvey is a monster throwing the ball Short + Intermediate, still without understand why with Chustz´s combines he is so bad... Or at least so low rated, maybe he could be a Cary Money mirror, with the right sistem he could be one of the best.... Or maybe I am crazy
                Miami Sharks (BLB)
                * BLB Champions --> 2017, 2020.

                Ohio River Sharks (OSFL)
                * OSFL Bowl CHAMPION > 2036, 2047.

                Comment


                • #38
                  one word Frodo, altho i think Jeffery was right the height played a factor in his failure

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Sharkn20 View Post
                    Now Check Chustz (31/50), Harvey (56/60) and Douglas (33/45), and rated them by usefull QBs during the games, I think that Chustz is the most serviciable despite his Ratings, but Harvey is a monster throwing the ball Short + Intermediate, still without understand why with Chustz´s combines he is so bad... Or at least so low rated, maybe he could be a Cary Money mirror, with the right sistem he could be one of the best.... Or maybe I am crazy
                    Did Harvey TC bump too? I thought he looked alright IIRC but I think his sense rush was on the low side.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by FoosballWizard View Post
                      Did Harvey TC bump too? I thought he looked alright IIRC but I think his sense rush was on the low side.
                      Not he hit -1 in the 1st and +1 in the 2nd... Maybe he is a Drew Bledsoe man!! stone feets!
                      Miami Sharks (BLB)
                      * BLB Champions --> 2017, 2020.

                      Ohio River Sharks (OSFL)
                      * OSFL Bowl CHAMPION > 2036, 2047.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by FoosballWizard View Post
                        Did Harvey TC bump too? I thought he looked alright IIRC but I think his sense rush was on the low side.
                        You can see it in the pic above, his SR in near zero. He can sling a short ball, though.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by garion333 View Post
                          You can see it in the pic above, his SR in near zero. He can sling a short ball, though.
                          Derp, correct. He was my second choice though. I was intrigued by Syron too but didn't scout him so I avoided him.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            seriously man, we gotta lobby for a different system next year

                            if only 10 guys get to make their pick when they like and the other 22 are stuck with a one or two day 3-hour clock situation that's no good
                            Discuss.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              That was me...

                              I was thinking, we often have 5 or more days of the slow roll period, where we can get anywhere from an entire round done to barely getting through the top 10. It's a near week where a lot of people are checking in but the timing is really unpredictable.

                              I was one of the people who pushed hard for the institution of the slow roll, but now I don't know. Before the slow roll the first days of the draft could be agonizing, but so is the unpredictability. And we'd get round one done in two or three days anyway.

                              What I was thinking was we could do away with the slow roll, start the draft later, and have Round 1 in three days. Top 10 one day, then 11-21 day 2, then 22-32 day 3. Still gives people time, and the draft would be force stopped after each day's allotment of picks are done - so it gives everyone in the first round predictability. If you know where you're picking, you know which day to show up. If you can't, you can check in the night before and set a reasonable queue based on what's been taken....or trade into a day when you can be there.

                              And if you're not around at all, then you'll have to be autoed.

                              After those three days we'd proceed as normal (although I'd still like a 2-hr round 2, 90-min rd3-4, and 1hr or less for 5-7).

                              Some people might hate this idea though, and we should definitely cater to the minority here - can't screw over anyone. Although under status quo if we start Thursday at 1.7 or 1.8, those of us at the bottom of the round might have to be checking in all day only to watch the draft finish at 1.20 for the evening clock.
                              Float likeabutterflysting likeabee.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                as someone on -10 gmt id have to disagree with people LITERALLY around the world and as someone said earlier we have real lives just cause shark and some others are antsy sorry

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X