WLB - MLB - SLB // 4-3 and 3-4

[Aston]

I think my suspicion is strongly that Jim didn't devise two entirely different, nuanced mechanisms for defense in this game. So aside from renaming the RDE as a 3-4 WLB, there are no differences. Insofar as "matchups" exist (and they might, if the SLB is supposed to be "on" the TE), then the WLB would be the same as the RDE. I usually see this as the WLB matches up on the LT. Who knows though. Not something I've looked at closely.

[Guest]

DL
34 LDE = 43 LDE
34 NT = 43 LDT
34 RDE = 43 RDT
34 WLB = 43 RDE

I hate to disagree with a multi-bowl champion, but hey, it's just a discussion. (And I'm usually ok at defense. It's offense I'm hopeless at.) This is largely anecdotal, so take it for what it's worth.

The part I'm talking about is the highlighted section. Only reason I tend to disagree is that if you have a stud WLB, he's going to pile up like 20 sacks, 40+ hurries, those kind of numbers. RDEs never get near that, and my theory as to why...

The game doesn't play 'left-right'. It plays 'best-2nd best'. LDE, LCB, FL = best players. RDE, RCB, SE = second best. When you are in a traditional 4-3, the LDE is going to rack up the most sacks/hurries. Or rather, he will be awarded the most sacks/hurries.

I have a feeling it's something like this... game matches up overall OL vs overall DL (4 DL in a 4-3, 3 DL + WLB in a 3-4). Adds in blitzing/blocking backs, etc. Determines a sack happens. Checks for highest percentage of likelihood as to who gets it. In a 4-3, the monster LDE with a huge PRT has the highest weight. In a 3-4, the always-rushing WLB does.

A smaller corollary of a theory I have is that PRS = inside rush, check vs. OL strength, and PRT = outside rush, check vs. OL technique.

And since we're throwing beliefs out there, or at least I am... I think the SLB's coverage skills are a huge key when dealing with a quality TE. Closest thing to a 'real' football logic in the game. If your SLB has weak coverage skills, odds are that opposing TE is going to have a good receiving day.

Signed,

Bored at Work.

[mike17]

And since we're throwing beliefs out there, or at least I am... I think the SLB's coverage skills are a huge key when dealing with a quality TE. Closest thing to a 'real' football logic in the game. If your SLB has weak coverage skills, odds are that opposing TE is going to have a good receiving day.

In case you don't wanna read that wall o' text, this is the important part IMO