2023 Week 6 Results.

[Guest]

Elusiveness is longer runs for big gains as well as a greater risk of being stuffed. I like it in RBs that don't have a nice breakaway gear, but for an all-around stud who does have that, and high HR, low elusiveness seems to be the dream.

I dunno, I've always liked that bar and it's only more recently that I thought maybe there really are some downsides to it. It's one reason why when I canvassed the league for RBs last year, I didn't try to go for Giang -- that only happened close to the deadline when nouvelle approached me.

If you run a lot and have a pass-blocking OL it will hurt the ypc. Dunno if that matters too much as long as you're getting consistent and solid output.

For an example of a RB with high elusiveness see Greg Diblaiso. One of the reasons I got rid of him was I was looking for more consistent outside rushes and he would get stuffed more than not, or go for 10+ yards. I'd rather have 3 yds, 3yds, 15 yds, 7 yds, etc. Not a fan of 2nd and 3rd or long as it gives the defense an edge.

[Guest]

At least 9 penalties for 80 yards, two ints by Parrish and two passing plays on one drive for 45 yards. Didn't really deserve to win but the stiff red zone defense and a clutch interception by Van Friedgen helped.

Parrish continues to baffle me. He was money for me my first few years in the league. Even though Nate Small was awesome replacing him the first two weeks, I can't justify starting a 42 rated QB over a 65 rated one.

I say keep Parrish in, I could use some INTs and sacks to pad my defensive stats.

Somehow I'm #1 overall in pass defense, so I look forward to the turnovers.

[Guest]

T-t-triple post!

Sorry to rub this in, Ozias, but I was very happy to see this:

FL Julio Strickland, 9 targets, 3 catches, 35 yards, 0 tds, 0 drops

Booyah!

[Guest]

I say keep Parrish in, I could use some INTs and sacks to pad my defensive stats.

Somehow I'm #1 overall in pass defense, so I look forward to the turnovers.

The over under for Parrish interceptions this week is 3.5.

[Ozias]

T-t-triple post!

Sorry to rub this in, Ozias, but I was very happy to see this:

FL Julio Strickland, 9 targets, 3 catches, 35 yards, 0 tds, 0 drops

Booyah!

That had a lot to do with this...

Frank Erickson 10 comp with 26 att and 81 yds.

Utterly brutal game for Erickson.

[Guest]

GG Rip. It seems we've gotten tired of the playing close games, only blow outs for Camden this year (one way or another).

Also. Really refs? Really? 18 penalties for 144 yards?

You've only flagged our opponents this year 17 times combined.

We somehow earned a yellow hanky 11 times for 92 yards in just the 4th quarter (and we went into the 4th tied 17-17). One in three of our offensive snaps in the 4th included a penalty.

Sure you could say it was the Burt Newman fumble inside our own 10 that doomed us but guess how we ended up back inside our own 10? Yup, more penalties including one the play before that erased a 13 yard run.

Travel warning for anything planning about visiting Camden in the next few weeks (not that anyone intentionaly visits Camden), don't wear stripes.

[Rip Murdock]

GG Rip. It seems we've gotten tired of the playing close games, only blow outs for Camden this year (one way or another).

Also. Really refs? Really? 18 penalties for 144 yards?

You've only flagged our opponents this year 17 times combined.

We somehow earned a yellow hanky 11 times for 92 yards in just the 4th quarter (and we went into the 4th tied 17-17). One in three of our offensive snaps in the 4th included a penalty.

Sure you could say it was the Burt Newman fumble inside our own 10 that doomed us but guess how we ended up back inside our own 10? Yup, more penalties including one the play before that erased a 13 yard run.

Travel warning for anything planning about visiting Camden in the next few weeks (not that anyone intentionaly visits Camden), don't wear stripes.

Those penalties were killer and the 3 turnovers didn't help either. Las Vegas brought some casino luck to Camden to win this one. GG.