Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

1989 Philadelphia Freedom Season Preview - Pitching Staff and Season Outlook

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 1989 Philadelphia Freedom Season Preview - Pitching Staff and Season Outlook

    Well, this unit looks completely different after a fairly stable rotation the last couple of seasons. Gone are the best pitcher in franchise history and a tough veteran who logged a club record 233.0 IP at the age of 34. Between Aurillo and Nathan we have 443.2 innings to replace. We anticipate employing a 6-man rotation to begin the year because we’ll be plugging a couple of young arms into the rotation and we want to limit their innings.

    The most important of those young arms belongs to Doug “Light” Miles. Currently listed as the #12 prospect by BA, Miles will be given the opportunity to make the team in ST. Should he fail to do so, the 6-man rotation may not come to fruition.

    We had one of the top pitching staffs in the league last year and can’t possibly hope to repeat that effort considering the player movement we initiated this offseason. We think this staff can compete and keep us in games, but a league leading ERA is probably not in the cards.


    Starting Rotation

    Joe Arredondo - Age: 33 - Topped 200 IP for the second time in his career. The first time he did that was in 1985 and he suffered an injury in ’86 that cost him 6 weeks. The only bright side? It wasn’t an arm injury that cost him time that year. It was an oblique strain. Still, at the age of 33, we’ll try to limit his innings with the 6-man rotation.

    Ben Irvin - Age: 32 - Topped 200 IP for the second time in his career. The first time he did that was in 1986 and he suffered an injury in ’87 that cost him 2+ months. That one was actually a shoulder injury, so we are a bit concerned about his innings this year. Again, the 6-man rotation should hopefully limit his innings.

    Joe Ponte - Age: 33 - This guy produces 200+ IP seasons like a 6 year old Chinese kid makes Nike’s. He’s done it in 10 out of the 11 BLB seasons. He’s the all-time league leader in GS, taking the hill 365 times to this point. We think his high ground-ball % will play well with our revamped infield defense.

    Mark Melanson - Age: 35 - Brought in to soak up some innings and get groundballs. The groundballs we think we’ll get, the innings = TBD.

    Cristian Correa - Age: 24 - He thinks he belongs in the rotation. Our scout thinks he belongs in the rotation. We’re not convinced he belongs in the rotation, but he will get his shot. He’s been a staple of our bullpen the last two years but a couple of additions to that unit give us the opportunity to test drive him as a SP.

    Doug “Light” Miles - Age: 21 - The most important player in our entire organization. If he reaches his potential he will anchor our rotation for the next 8-10 years. If he doesn’t? I’ll trade him for a package that includes a ham sandwich. We don’t expect him to come in and dominate BLB hitters. That’s unlikely to happen, but we do want him to get experience against the best hitters to prepare him for a season or two down the road. He’ll be on a strict pitch count and we’ll look to limit his innings.


    Bullpen

    Calvin James - Age: 33 - FA acquisition that will compete for the CL role vacated by Joe Alveraz. He’s had an up-and-down career to this point, mixing in a couple of good seasons with a couple of bad seasons. Last year was pretty good, so we’re hoping for the second half of that pattern this year.

    Chad Mullen - Age: 26 - Another new face in the pen, brought over in the Alveraz deal. We like his makeup and our scouting department thinks he may have enough to be a starter. We’ll use him in the pen this year and he might also compete for the CL role.

    Trevor Broomfield - Age: 29 - Our 3rd candidate for the CL role. He has been rock steady the last two seasons, getting off to great 1st halves and really anchoring the bullpen from a setup perspective. He wouldn’t be a prototypical CL because he doesn’t K enough people, but in a closer by committee scenario he will get his chances.

    Ray Minnoz - Age: 27 - Swing starter who can provide innings in a pinch. Has produced double digit win totals the last two years (10 and 11).

    Chet Clark - Age: 25 - His minor league numbers suggest he could be a useful arm out of the pen, but there’s a decent chance he turns out to be a AAAA player for his career. Needs to get off to a good start or he’ll be quickly dispatched to AAA once again and called upon in the event of an injury.

    Adam Starks - Age: 23 - He was just ok in his rookie season. He’ll be expected to fill the same role he had last year, LHP middle relief to bridge the gap between the starter and the back of the pen on nights when our top MR guys aren’t able to go.

    Jesus Taborga - Age: 27 - Same as Starks, he’ll be expected to fill the LHP middle relief role on days we need a lefty arm.


    Stay by the Phone - Minor Leaguers

    Sadao Yoshino - Age : 24 - Probably not ready yet for the big time, but if an injury occurs he may be one of the first call-ups made. His K/9 rate has been solid in the upper minors, so there’s a chance he could compete at the BLB level out of the pen if need be.

    Nate Taylor - Age: 25 - Needs his control to improve to at least a passable level before he can have a chance at the BLB level. He’s got the stuff (3 straight years with 10+ k/9) and might get a call if we need a bullpen arm or a spot starter.

    Joe Avila - Age: 21 - He’s never jumped off the page at me when reading scouting reports, but last season he jumped up several notches in our eyes. His scouting report still isn’t anything to write home about, but his K/9 rate basically doubled last season (from 4.2+ to 8.3+) and he throws groundballs (60%+) and throws hard (94-96mph). If he repeats his ’88 performance he may see time in the Freedom pen before the season is over.


    1989 Outlook

    What do we expect? That’s somewhat difficult to say. Overall we are placing a lot of responsibility on some young players to produce in meaningful ways. If most of the young guys come through and hold their own, we’ll probably be ok. If a majority of those young guys falter, our season will falter along with them.

    I think the over/under for this team is somewhere in the 84 wins range. Not enough to win the division (or even a wildcard for that matter), but we expect to play meaningful games in August and September. If we can overachieve just a little, we may have another playoff run in us yet.

    LINK
    Philly Freedom
    Owner & GM: 1987 - Pres.
    Porter Div. Champs (Mbr '84-'15): 1984, 1985, 1988, 1990, 1991, 2002, 2004, 2010, 2011
    Stout Div. Champs (Mbr '78-'83 & '16-present): 2016, 2017
    IL Wild Card Winner: 1987, 2013, 2018, 2019
    Import League Champs: 1984, 2010, 2017

  • #2
    More and more people going with six-man rotations.

    I think history plays into that a bit. There are concerns with overworking young arms and concerns with overworking valuable veterans.

    I find it intriguing and not the least bit alarming. It works now because we have little to prove it does not. Another 10 years from now, who knows what teams will be trying.

    You have the perfect recipe to use the 6-man rotation (at least the way I would use it). You have four guys over 32, past their prime and two capable young arms that need a shot in proving their worth. Go for it.
    Denver Bulls

    Comment


    • #3
      I think one of the biggest benefits to using a 6-man rotation, moreso than keeping guys fresh and less injuries, is just opportunity. How many teams, know, for a fact who are the best five SPs on their team and beyond a doubt know that no one else in the org will perform better? Answer, nobody knows exactly how a guy is going to pitch.

      For me, this year, #4-#6 are all up for grabs. If by mid-May all my starters have a sub 3.00 ERA and one guy has a 5.00+ ERA, he will likely get pulled and I'll either go five-man or get someone else in the #6 spot for a shot.

      Granted, a lot of teams don't have the luxury of having six quality guys they can start or can afford in such tight playoff races to not go with the five best versus five good and one kinda-good.
      Wilmington Wildcats- 2057-
      Seattle Pilots- 2017-2041
      Washington Bats - 1979-2013

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Pat View Post
        I think one of the biggest benefits to using a 6-man rotation, moreso than keeping guys fresh and less injuries, is just opportunity. How many teams, know, for a fact who are the best five SPs on their team and beyond a doubt know that no one else in the org will perform better? Answer, nobody knows exactly how a guy is going to pitch.
        Me! Me! Me! I do!
        The Great One!

        To many rings to count...

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Pat View Post
          I think one of the biggest benefits to using a 6-man rotation, moreso than keeping guys fresh and less injuries, is just opportunity. How many teams, know, for a fact who are the best five SPs on their team and beyond a doubt know that no one else in the org will perform better? Answer, nobody knows exactly how a guy is going to pitch.

          For me, this year, #4-#6 are all up for grabs. If by mid-May all my starters have a sub 3.00 ERA and one guy has a 5.00+ ERA, he will likely get pulled and I'll either go five-man or get someone else in the #6 spot for a shot.

          Granted, a lot of teams don't have the luxury of having six quality guys they can start or can afford in such tight playoff races to not go with the five best versus five good and one kinda-good.
          That's true.

          I figure teams going with a six-man rotation have one of three things going for them:

          1. They have 6 capable starters.
          2. They're very unsure of their bottom rotation.
          3. They want to limit innings.

          That kind of sums up at least one of every team in the league, but number 2 and 3 are also special cases. You can be unsure of your bottom rotation, but you may not have a third or fourth guy you want to roll out there to see what he's got, so you stick with a five man rotation. You may want to limit innings, but you may not have a sixth arm you can throw out there.

          I know Washington and Philly are going six-man. Denver is going six-man. I think we all have slightly different reasons but we feel we definitely fit the criteria for 1. and 3. Actually, you probably can't have 3. without 1. 2. is slightly different. A struggling team might go with a six-man for the second reason and I think that would make sense if they have a variation of the first reason - perhaps they want to find out if they have six capable starters.
          Denver Bulls

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Clay View Post
            Me! Me! Me! I do!
            Yea, I can't argue this. You have a very balanced five-man rotation. There are no serious questions there. You know who your five best are and they should all perform at least league average.
            Denver Bulls

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Carlos View Post
              Yea, I can't argue this. You have a very balanced five-man rotation. There are no serious questions there. You know who your five best are and they should all perform at least league average.
              And they're all homegrown... I know I keep mentioning it... but it's a pride thing for me. It took me a lot of bad seasons and lucky drafts to build it.
              The Great One!

              To many rings to count...

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Clay View Post
                And they're all homegrown... I know I keep mentioning it... but it's a pride thing for me. It took me a lot of bad seasons and lucky drafts to build it.
                and, they're all 27 or younger, with 3 of them 22 or younger. You should definitely be proud of your rotation and you probably will be for many, many seasons to come. Is the time of the Colonials finally at hand?!
                Philly Freedom
                Owner & GM: 1987 - Pres.
                Porter Div. Champs (Mbr '84-'15): 1984, 1985, 1988, 1990, 1991, 2002, 2004, 2010, 2011
                Stout Div. Champs (Mbr '78-'83 & '16-present): 2016, 2017
                IL Wild Card Winner: 1987, 2013, 2018, 2019
                Import League Champs: 1984, 2010, 2017

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Clay View Post
                  And they're all homegrown... I know I keep mentioning it... but it's a pride thing for me. It took me a lot of bad seasons and lucky drafts to build it.
                  The plan is to be able to say the same thing in Denver in 1990.

                  edit:

                  Can't really say that. I can say they all went through the minor league system, but Greene will have been acquired via trade.
                  Last edited by Carlos; 03-10-2010, 05:44 PM.
                  Denver Bulls

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Clay View Post
                    And they're all homegrown... I know I keep mentioning it... but it's a pride thing for me. It took me a lot of bad seasons and lucky drafts to build it.
                    But, with them all being so young, wouldn't using a six man rotation benefit you to help limit innings/injuries/burnout for your young arms?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I probably should do a 6 man rotation, but I can't bring myself to do it. Plus my 6th man would probably be AA material.
                      Charlotte Knights - OSFL
                      Syracuse Slammers - BLB
                      South America - 1984 WBC Runner Up

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by jwolf02 View Post
                        I probably should do a 6 man rotation, but I can't bring myself to do it. Plus my 6th man would probably be AA material.






                        ....and....scene.
                        The Great One!

                        To many rings to count...

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Hopefully providing you with that opportunity brought my shavermetric score back up a little.
                          Charlotte Knights - OSFL
                          Syracuse Slammers - BLB
                          South America - 1984 WBC Runner Up

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by jwolf02 View Post
                            Hopefully providing you with that opportunity brought my shavermetric score back up a little.
                            While I appreciate the setup, the Math has no sense of humor.
                            The Great One!

                            To many rings to count...

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X