Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Stat of the day

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • My theory would be that even if a better team has more save situations - say, 80 to 60 - 80 means your guy is going to be out there every other night, with a lot of back to back to back streaks in there. 60 is every three nights. So your main guy would be fresher for a higher percentage of the bad teams opportunities. But that's probably a stupid theory.
    Charlotte Knights - OSFL
    Syracuse Slammers - BLB
    South America - 1984 WBC Runner Up

    Comment


    • Samir: Yes, this is horrible, this idea.
      Wilmington Wildcats- 2057-
      Seattle Pilots- 2017-2041
      Washington Bats - 1979-2013

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Andrew View Post
        The best teams actually have had the most saves since the league started:

        http://www.simgamingnetwork.com/blb/...&subleague=All
        So this supports my earlier theory that they can't trot the same closer out ther night after night. I think a top closer is gonna get his 40-55 saves a year regardless of the team he's on. You can't give a guy that many appearances that would allow him to get 80 saves. He would die.
        WINDY CITY PLAYBOYS
        Bock Division Champions - 1978, 1979, 1980, 1982, 1986, 1990, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009
        Wildcard Playoff Berths - 1984, 1988, 1993, 2010
        Import League Champions - 1978, 1979, 1980, 1986, 2008, 2009
        BLB Champions - 1986, 2009
        Hall of Famers: 4
        Pale Ale Pitcher Awards: 6
        Stout Sluggers: 2
        New Brews: 6

        Originally posted by fsquid
        You guys should trade with Windy City.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Jistic View Post
          So this supports my earlier theory that they can't trot the same closer out ther night after night. I think a top closer is gonna get his 40-55 saves a year regardless of the team he's on. You can't give a guy that many appearances that would allow him to get 80 saves. He would die.

          That's exactly what I meant to say. Thanks Jistic.
          Charlotte Knights - OSFL
          Syracuse Slammers - BLB
          South America - 1984 WBC Runner Up

          Comment


          • I don't know. What's the difference between the closer and that middle reliever on your team that has 80 appearances?

            Why would the closer not be used in all save opportunities when the middle reliever is being used in 80 games where some times the game is already won or lost?
            Denver Bulls

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Pat View Post
              Samir: Yes, this is horrible, this idea.
              Haha, I watched this the other night. Nice.

              Comment


              • <table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr class="title2"><td>Most Seasons Below .400 Winning Percentage</td></tr> <tr><td> <table style="width: 641px; height: 270px;" class="sortable" border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"> <thead><tr class="headline"><td class="hsc2_l">Team</td><td class="hsc2">Below .400 Seasons</td></tr></thead> <tbody><tr class="s1"><td class="s1_l">California Kodiaks</td><td>4</td></tr> <tr class="s2"><td class="s2_l">Virginia Colonials</td><td>3</td></tr> <tr class="s1"><td class="s1_l">Mississippi Storm</td><td>3</td></tr> <tr class="s2"><td class="s2_l">Pawtucket Patriots</td><td>3</td></tr> <tr class="s1"><td class="s1_l">Philadelphia Freedom</td><td>2</td></tr> <tr class="s2"><td class="s2_l">Morgantown Mohawks</td><td>2</td></tr> <tr class="s1"><td class="s1_l">Pittsburgh Millers</td><td>2</td></tr> <tr class="s2"><td class="s2_l">Dallas Snappers</td><td>2</td></tr> <tr class="s1"><td class="s1_l">Wilmington Wildcats</td><td>1</td></tr> <tr class="s2"><td class="s2_l">Los Alamos Bandits</td><td>1</td></tr> <tr class="s1"><td class="s1_l">Indianapolis Clowns</td><td>1</td></tr> <tr class="s2"><td class="s2_l">Sin City Gamblers</td><td>1</td></tr></tbody></table></td></tr></tbody></table>

                Comment


                • Suck on that one losers!

                  Oh, wait.
                  California Kodiaks - GM - 1982-2013
                  Brewmaster's Cups: 1987
                  Import League Champions: 1987, 1989
                  Porter Division Champions:
                  1986, 1987, 1989, 1999
                  , 2000
                  Import League Wild Card: 2001, 2003, 2004

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Lintyfresh85 View Post
                    Suck on that one losers!

                    Oh, wait.
                    Were all of those yours Linty?


                    Baltimore Bulldogs - BLB since '84
                    - Porter Champs: '92, '93, '97, '98, '01, '03, '06, '08, '12
                    - Playoffs: '92, '93, '97, '98, '99, '01, '03, '06, '08, '12, '13, '14, '15, '16
                    - Brewmaster's Cup: '01

                    Comment


                    • That was a heck of an '81 campaign...39 total wins?

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by elprez98 View Post
                        Were all of those yours Linty?
                        No. Just one.
                        California Kodiaks - GM - 1982-2013
                        Brewmaster's Cups: 1987
                        Import League Champions: 1987, 1989
                        Porter Division Champions:
                        1986, 1987, 1989, 1999
                        , 2000
                        Import League Wild Card: 2001, 2003, 2004

                        Comment


                        • Mine are all mine... and in a row.... and hopefully in the (wait for it, ElPrez.... wait for it.....) rear view mirror.
                          The Great One!

                          To many rings to count...

                          Comment


                          • How am I not on that list?
                            Charlotte Knights - OSFL
                            Syracuse Slammers - BLB
                            South America - 1984 WBC Runner Up

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by jwolf02 View Post
                              How am I not on that list?
                              This is not meant as an insult, but you not being on that list is probably why its taken a while for you to make your team better than the "cusp-of-500."

                              You've been good enough to avoid the top picks in the draft, but bad enough to not play for a division championship.

                              What a weird position to be in. I think those teams are the hardest to rebuild. At least you keep trying.
                              Denver Bulls

                              Comment


                              • Insult taken.

                                Just kidding. I agree 100%. The problem is, my core right now is still a bunch of guys you'd want to rebuild around. Carbajal, Zamora, Cannell... my lineup is relatively young outside of Cuevas (and I suppose rancourt). My pitching is terrible. So... i can't do much to get really bad. It's not like I can cut bait on a lot of aging stars. Not that I would want to though, but... anyways. Hope that made sense.
                                Charlotte Knights - OSFL
                                Syracuse Slammers - BLB
                                South America - 1984 WBC Runner Up

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X