If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Actually I take that back. I was using a spreadsheet I made with all the players and each scouts ratings. It was only my top 3 scouts. Not the other 2 clowns.
Well that was my first "screw the other scouts, just go with my headscout's best player" and he had him at a 68. It'd be a nice surprise if he was even half right, my other scouts all gave him 20's.
Well that was my first "screw the other scouts, just go with my headscout's best player" and he had him at a 68. It'd be a nice surprise if he was even half right, my other scouts all gave him 20's.
I did one of those on my last pick. That's going to be my philosophy the rest of the way.
That's really all you can do at this point due to the atrocious lack of depth in this draft pool. My head pitching scout thinks Valler has 67 potential, but the rest of my scouts think he's trash. As do all of you obviously, since he was still on the board. I don't like his lack of endurance and I don't like his work ethic, but almost 100 picks into a shallow draft, what the hell ever....
SIN CITY GAMBLERSsince 1990 NEW ORLEANS DUKESsince 1993
1998 BLB Champions
2000 BLB Champions
Comment