Please discuss this and vote. You might want to hold off your vote until people state their case for both sides.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Overall Ratings - Please Read
Collapse
X
-
Can't vote since 1 - 20 isn't an option here. That's what I voted for in the rating scale poll.
Whatever rating system we use it should be the same for overall as the scale used. Not have one at 20 - 80 and the other at 2 - 8.It takes neither courage nor intelligence to cheer for a team only when that team wins. The true test of a fan's mettle is the same as it is for a player: Were you there when you were needed?
Comment
-
Originally posted by BruceMCan't vote since 1 - 20 isn't an option here. That's what I voted for in the rating scale poll.
Whatever rating system we use it should be the same for overall as the scale used. Not have one at 20 - 80 and the other at 2 - 8.
Comment
-
Originally posted by AndrewOriginally posted by BruceMCan't vote since 1 - 20 isn't an option here. That's what I voted for in the rating scale poll.
Whatever rating system we use it should be the same for overall as the scale used. Not have one at 20 - 80 and the other at 2 - 8.It takes neither courage nor intelligence to cheer for a team only when that team wins. The true test of a fan's mettle is the same as it is for a player: Were you there when you were needed?
Comment
-
Originally posted by BruceMAre we talking about the same thing?
I know for a fact in 2006 you could set overall ratings and scale ratings to any of the choices available, 1-5, 2-8, 1-10, 1-20, 20-80, & 1-100.It takes neither courage nor intelligence to cheer for a team only when that team wins. The true test of a fan's mettle is the same as it is for a player: Were you there when you were needed?
Comment
Comment