2014 BLB Amateur Draft Beginning Tues 11/10

[Sharkn20]

I'll have to disagree.

The majority of player development is based on play time in the minors. I'm with you in that Rule V should be reinstated if this were implemented.

However, if Matt says it will likely be a logistical nightmare. We have to respect that and look for alternatives.

Submit a votation! I will say yes.

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

[Ryan]

I'd vote yes. The structure of our league demands it. We draft high school and college players, then expect them to compete and progress in the same league?

That's no different than the age restriction we placed on our Single-A league.

I get the argument against it due to league involvement, but not league structure, and to an extent, league integrity.

[Ryan]

That's unacceptable, I would start to penalize that kind of managers... Woth draft picks or Cash

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

Unfortunately, that would only drive owners away. Missed exports really aren't that big a deal, as long as they're sporadic or nothings going on.

[Sharkn20]

Unfortunately, that would only drive owners away. Missed exports really aren't that big a deal, as long as they're sporadic or nothings going on.

I mean breaking single A rules, not missing exports.

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

[Ryan]

I mean breaking single A rules, not missing exports.

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

Ah. It's kind of a simple rule to break, given that you need to keep up on birthdays all year long. What guy is good at that???

A note on this though, for Brad or Matt, can't we just turn on the age restriction for this league in the league rules? That way you guys wouldn't have to check.

[Matt]

No. We don't have that option. Only for created players do you have an age cap. In reality it's not that big of a deal. I just DFA them from the main A all player page.

[umd]

I would be in favor of a rookie league. I would not be in favor of returning to Rule V. Rule 5 is a nightmare and I'm not in favor of bringing it back.

With all the above stated, I would vote no on a rookie league. I don't think we have the commitment to managing the minor league teams across the board GM wise. Missing exports do happen, making age mistakes with A do happen - I just did it for the first time in a long time, and not having enough minor leaguers does happen. It's always going to happen, not because people don't care, but because managing your minors is cumbersome. I love developing players, but I will always side with Matt. We have a lot of busy GMs here right now. Many of them are the older GMs too. I'm one and I know there are others. I think missed exports and roster issues aren't a huge problem right now. However, I think they could be in the future.

Just my opinion. I'm against hoarding like Jimmy stated, but reinstating rule 5 and opening a 20 and under rookie league is not the answer either. Active GMs are going to be hoarders. IMO they are also the most equipped to make vital decisions on young players instead of kicking the can down the road like Prez said.

[Carlos]

No. We don't have that option. Only for created players do you have an age cap. In reality it's not that big of a deal. I just DFA them from the main A all player page.

OOTP needs that option. Surprised it doesn't exist.

sent from my mobile device

[Ryan]

No. We don't have that option. Only for created players do you have an age cap. In reality it's not that big of a deal. I just DFA them from the main A all player page.

I may be looking at the wrong thing, but if you go to league settings, under rules, there's a setting under roster rules for active roster player age minimum, and a setting for maximum. Wouldn't this work?

Keep in mind I'm looking at a solo league, so maybe it's different in an online league.

[Z]

Here's a compromise idea.

What if we expanded single-A rosters to 30 players?

It would open up an extra 5 slots on each club for teenage prospects who aren't ready to play every day. They could stay on the roster and get at-bats here and there as they develop.

We'd keep the age cap in place, so it wouldn't contribute much to teams "hoarding" players for years because teams would still have to keep promoting guys as they aged. So it wouldn't be the same as the proposal years ago for adding more AAA roster spots.

Plus, adding roster spots wouldn't create additional work for owners. They wouldn't need to manage another team.

[Carlos]

Yeah as an only option I would be for 30 man A rosters.

sent from my mobile device

[Ryan]

I'd be fine with expanding the single-a rosters.

[Sharkn20]

I'd be fine with expanding the single-a rosters.

Me too. Would love a Rookie league though

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

[Carlos]

My 5th round pick is coming. Waited all day and then the two hours I wasn't around, it sat on me.

[funclown]

Pawtucket drafts a 'Pat Howell' type in 1B/C Tom England. Last 6 pot for power for catchers. See where this goes goes.

Then we drafted a fringe player in SP Dave Calvert based a bit on our scout and partly based on velocity and team leadership.(dreaded 5-5-5 for pot)

It's the start of the 6th round. We're allowed some liberties.