Utilities are up!

[Clay]

Give me Shavermetrics.

They're in the works. I'm in discussions to bring them into a new media outlet.

[Jistic]

Give me Shavermetrics.

Shavermetrics and the in game preview are way better. The utilities think every team is going to be exactly the same as last year. Wow, what insight! lol.

[Carlos]

Shavermetrics and the in game preview are way better. The utilities think every team is going to be exactly the same as last year. Wow, what insight! lol.

I'm +3. That's huge.


Sent from my mobile device.

[Matt]

Shavermetrics and the in game preview are way better. The utilities think every team is going to be exactly the same as last year. Wow, what insight! lol.

Pawtuckett is -11
Batavia is +8
Baltimore is +7
Pitt is -6

I'd say those are big changes.

[Clay]

It has me at a -3 and not winning the title. That alone blows all credibility.

[Jistic]

Pawtuckett is -11
Batavia is +8
Baltimore is +7
Pitt is -6

I'd say those are big changes.

And pretty much all the same teams in the playoffs as last year.

[Clay]

I don't know if this PREVIEW in the utility updates throughout the season, but, much like Shavermetrics, it's obviously a snapshot in time and can't predict the moves people will make.

[funclown]

Might just be based on WAR change. All the Ale teams in the "Offseason Screen" were taking WAR hits at the time. Seemed to follow it.

With that, I agree with the preview.