Why are some of you using a 6 man rotation? Is there an advatage with Ootp 11? In real life it would severly hurt your team.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Pitching Rotations
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by tomr1962 View PostWhy are some of you using a 6 man rotation? Is there an advatage with Ootp 11? In real life it would severly hurt your team.
(Insert "No being the Commish keeps your players healthy" posts)The Great One!
To many rings to count...
-
Originally posted by tomr1962 View PostWhy are some of you using a 6 man rotation? Is there an advatage with Ootp 11? In real life it would severly hurt your team.
I want to give my best starters the most starts possible. Most of the time, I don't run a 6-man rotation because I know that I've never really had the depth to do so in years. I may move to a six man temporarily during the last couple of weeks that we have 23-25 straight games during the summer. I have also moved to six man rotations when I had a lead in the the division and felt that I had a good enough cushion to win the Porter later in the season.
With our low injury settings, a huge key to success is building a team based on durability (see Virginia). That way, you can keep all of your best players on the field for 3 years straight with no injuries.
Seriously, I think the 6-man rotation is just placebo when people look at some of the keys to success in this game. At most, there are less than a handful of teams that can pull it off with little to no drop off in performance. I don't really think its worth it.
Take into account that I have a terrible record this year before you listen to my advice, though.Last edited by Delandis; 12-20-2011, 02:47 PM.
Baltimore Bulldogs - BLB since '84
- Porter Champs: '92, '93, '97, '98, '01, '03, '06, '08, '12
- Playoffs: '92, '93, '97, '98, '99, '01, '03, '06, '08, '12, '13, '14, '15, '16
- Brewmaster's Cup: '01
Comment
-
I've been using a six man rotation semi-regularly for 10+ seasons.
1. Decreases chance of injury. That extra day of rest is big when you play straight weeks.
2. Allows you to play pitchers based on matchups. Some pitchers fit different parks better, play the lefty vs. a lefty heavy lineup, etc.
3. Find out who your best pitchers are. Most years my #4 thru #6, or even top seven or eight, starting pitchers aren't much different. You can use the six man rotation to find out who your best options are.Wilmington Wildcats- 2057-
Seattle Pilots- 2017-2041
Washington Bats - 1979-2013
Comment
-
6 is a higher number than 5.
6 must be better.WINDY CITY PLAYBOYS
Bock Division Champions - 1978, 1979, 1980, 1982, 1986, 1990, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009
Wildcard Playoff Berths - 1984, 1988, 1993, 2010
Import League Champions - 1978, 1979, 1980, 1986, 2008, 2009
BLB Champions - 1986, 2009
Hall of Famers: 4
Pale Ale Pitcher Awards: 6
Stout Sluggers: 2
New Brews: 6
Originally posted by fsquidYou guys should trade with Windy City.
Comment
-
I would always want #1 and #2 pitching every 5th start. I could see mixing in others. If #1 and #2 aren't workhorses then they should be lower in the rotation.
When I was a kid Seaver , Palmer and the boys where playing in 4 man rotations. A 5th starter was just a spot guy to maintain rest. 300 innings a yr were common, no fricking pitch counts. These guys were able to pitch 20+ yrs also. Also they walked uphill to the park barefoot in the snow.BLB- Seattle Reign
Comment
-
You want the real reason I use it?
Because OOTP handles pitcher fatigue in the worst way possible. It's atrocious.
Actually keep an eye on your five-man rotation and you'll start to notice that guys aren't pitching on 100% complete rest despite having four days off.
I don't believe that OOTP recognizes a starter taking an extra day. I think it recognizes a starter taking too many days off, but the effect of one day is less than having a starter throw on 90%.
That's my belief at least.
Sent from my mobile device.Denver Bulls
Comment
-
Originally posted by tomr1962 View PostI would always want #1 and #2 pitching every 5th start. I could see mixing in others. If #1 and #2 aren't workhorses then they should be lower in the rotation.
When I was a kid Seaver , Palmer and the boys where playing in 4 man rotations. A 5th starter was just a spot guy to maintain rest. 300 innings a yr were common, no fricking pitch counts. These guys were able to pitch 20+ yrs also. Also they walked uphill to the park barefoot in the snow.
Originally posted by Carlos View PostYou want the real reason I use it?
Because OOTP handles pitcher fatigue in the worst way possible. It's atrocious.
Actually keep an eye on your five-man rotation and you'll start to notice that guys aren't pitching on 100% complete rest despite having four days off.
I don't believe that OOTP recognizes a starter taking an extra day. I think it recognizes a starter taking too many days off, but the effect of one day is less than having a starter throw on 90%.
That's my belief at least.
Sent from my mobile device.The Great One!
To many rings to count...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pat View PostI have a pitch count on every SP in my ORG.Philly Freedom
Owner & GM: 1987 - Pres.
Porter Div. Champs (Mbr '84-'15): 1984, 1985, 1988, 1990, 1991, 2002, 2004, 2010, 2011
Stout Div. Champs (Mbr '78-'83 & '16-present): 2016, 2017
IL Wild Card Winner: 1987, 2013, 2018, 2019
Import League Champs: 1984, 2010, 2017
Comment
-
I use a pitch count on guys in the minors I consider to be prospects, and some guys continue to have them their first year or so in the BLB. I usually increase the pitch count at they move through the minors as well. I'd like to think it helps, but who knows?
Comment
Comment